|
18 Feb 2008 04:53:24 | Charles Essmeier
Last April, President Bush enthusiastically signed into law the
oddly-named Bankruptcy Abuse and Consumer Protection Act. This
bill, representing the biggest overhaul of bankruptcy law in
twenty-five years, was written in order to discourage
“bankruptcy of convenience.” Proponents of the bill, which
included the credit card industry, say that the bill is
necessary in order to stop an avalanche of bankruptcy filings by
drug users and compulsive shoppers and gamblers. The law makes
it harder to have debts wiped away, requires credit counseling
for those considering bankruptcy, and holds attorneys
responsible for paperwork errors by their clients in bankruptcy
cases. The net result will probably be chaos, as fewer attorneys
will handle bankruptcy cases, credit counselors will raise their
fees, and more consumers with problem debt will be clueless as
to what they should do next. Adding to the confusion are some
new statistics that suggest that a large number of bankruptcies
that are thought to be personal are actually business
bankruptcies. As a result, the new law may be unfairly targeting
consumers for punishment when they are not actually the biggest
part of the problem. Worse, it could be harming small
businesses.
Studies suggest that the number of business
bankruptcies may actually be up to ten times higher than
previously reported. Many small businesses that fail and file
for bankruptcy do so under guidelines that technically classify
them as personal bankruptcies. The new law doesn’t account for
this, however, and treats such bankruptcy filers no differently
than those who file because they can’t stop shopping. It
benefits no one to force a small store owner to undergo
mandatory credit counseling when their business may have failed
due to other reasons, such as having a big-box retailer more in
next door. Even if that is the case, the law will require the
bankrupt business owner to attend counseling in order to learn
about managing personal and household budgets. This wastes the
time of both the business owner and the credit-counseling agency
and denies valuable counseling resources to those people who may
really need it.
In time, Congress may amend this
legislation if certain aspects of it do not work as intended. In
the meantime, small business owners and those with personal debt
problems will be inconvenienced, credit counseling agencies will
be overworked, and no one will be any better off for it.
About Author :
©Copyright 2005 by Retro Marketing. Charles Essmeier is the
owner of Retro Marketing, a firm devoted to informational
Websites, including End-Your-Debt.com, a site devoted to debt consolidation and
credit counseling, and HomeEquityHelp.com, a site devoted to
information regarding home equity loans.
|