18 Feb 2008 04:38:22 | David Hallstrom
The following article was written for Resources For
Attorneys.com by David Hallstrom, a private investigator, he is
not now nor has he ever been an attorney.
Section 415.20 (b) of the California Civil Code Of Procedure
States: If a copy of the summons and complaint cannot with
reasonable diligence be personally delivered to the person to be
served, as specified in Section 416.60, 416.70, 416.80, or
416.90, a summons may be served by leaving a copy of the summons
and complaint at the person's dwelling house, usual place of
abode, usual place of business, or usual mailing address other
than a United States Postal Service post office box, in the
presence of a competent member of the household or a person
apparently in charge of his or her office, place of business, or
usual mailing address other than a United States Postal Service
post office box, at least 18 years of age, who shall be informed
of the contents thereof, and by thereafter mailing a copy of the
summons and of the complaint by first-class mail, postage
prepaid to the person to be served at the place where a copy of
the summons and complaint were left. Service of a summons in
this manner is deemed complete on the 10th day after the mailing.
Most process servers understand dwelling house or usual place of
abode to mean the actual place where the person is currently
staying. It has, however, been our experience that this means
the official residence or place where the person is currently
staying. We have found that most courts consider the dwelling
house to be where the person is currently staying and the usual
place of abode to mean the persons permanent residence, ie: the
person lives with his parents but is currently away at school.
The persons dwelling house would be where he is currently
staying while in school and his usual place of abode would be
his parents house where he returns on vacations and when school
is on break and where he expects to return when he finishes
school. The same applies if the person is currently in the
hospital, away on a business trip or is on a vacation.
Usual place of business can mean different things. Say a person
works every day in a factory on 8th St., that of course would be
a usual place of business. Say a Doctor is on staff and shows up
for work regularly at ABC Hospital. He also rents office space
from a doctor's group at another location where he also sees
paitents. It has been our experience that both places could be
considered the Doctors usual place of business.
Usual mailing address other than a United States Postal Service
post office box. Usual mailing address can be a private mail box
service or any other place (Other than a U.S Post Office
branch.) that the subject uses as a mailing address. This does
not mean that the person must actually pick up or receive the
mail. It only means that the person must use the address as a
mailing address. Some people in order to evade creditors or
others give out mailing addresses but never pick up the mail. If
a person directs people to send that person's mail to a certain
address then that address can be considered a usual place of
mailing as the server would have no way of verifying that the
mail is actually picked up.
Competent member of the household does not mean family member.
It means anyone who resides at that residence, including full
time live in nannys, maids, gardeners, friends, etc.. As long as
the person resides ther full time they can be considered members
of the household.
Person apparently in charge does not mean, as some process
servers believe, a manager or officer of the business or place
of mailing. It means "the person apparently in charge. If, at an
office, the receptionist will not let the process server see
anyone else in the office, then the receptionist is the highest
person in charge that the server can serve. If the only person
who works at a mail box service says that he or she is only a
clerk, that person is still the person apparently in charge.
Serving a complaint in a gated community or security building
where the security guard will not allow entrance. On May 28,
1992, in the case of Robert Bein vs Bechtel-Jochim, the
California Court Of Appeals held that a guard gate does
constitute part of the dwelling and therefore the guard is a
competent member within the dwelling. The court reasoned that if
a process server is not permitted to proceed to the actual
residence, then the outer bounds of the actual dwelling place
must be deemed to extend to the location at which the process
server's progress is arrested.
Reasonable diligence has been interpreted differently in
different jurisdictions, however, we have found that if three
attempts are made at least eight hours apart and if at least two
of those attempts are made at the address wher the papers are
served then a substituted service on the fourth attempt is
usually considered valid.
The foregoing information is not given as legal advice. It is
instead given as information and opinion gathered and developed
through experience over the last thirty years. David Hallstrom
is the owner of Hallstrom Detective Agency and although the
agency no longer offers process serving services, it has,
through it's servers, completed service of several hundred
thousand legal documents. Although the author believes the
information to be accurate no guarantee is made or implied.
Permission is given to reprint this article providing credit is
given to the author, David G. Hallstrom, and a link is listed to
Resources For Attorneys the owner of this article. Anyone or any
company reprinting this article without giving proper credit and
the correct link, is doing so without permission and will be
subject to legal action.
About Author :
None