Home | Site Map | Submit Article
.
Article Search
 
Article Categories

Advice

Auto Motive

Business

Communications

Computers & Internet

Dating

Education

Employment

Entertainment

Environment

Family

Fashion

Finance

Food & Drink

Gardening

Health

Hobbies

Home Business

Home Improvement

Humor

Kids & Teen

Legal

Marketing

Music

Online Business

Parenting

Pets

Product Reviews

Real Estate

Recreation & Sports

Self Improvement

Site Promotion

Technology

Travel & Leisure

Web Development

Women

World Affairs

Writing

 
   
   Have Analysts Gotten Honest?


08 Mar 2008 09:19:59
| Mark Mahorney


It caught my attention when I heard an analyst on a popular financial news program tell investors to sell a stock because too many analysts liked the company, citing the fact that there were no sell ratings.

It seemed perfectly logical to me that analysts wouldn’t be telling investors to sell 3M (MMM), which has one of the most consistent positive earnings records in the history of the stock markets. But being suspicious of conflicts of interest between brokerage firms and analysts I decided to do a bit of fact checking anyway.

While the stock did not have any sell ratings at the time of writing, there were quite a few hold ratings. Now I feel compelled to diverge here and say that the hold rating seems quite illogical to me. If a stock is good enough to hold it’s good enough to buy, and vice versa if you wouldn’t want to buy it then you shouldn’t want to hold on to it either.

As it turns out, the average analyst rating for 3M was only slightly and insignificantly better than the average for all stocks in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, of which the company is a component.

But what was most interesting about the ratings on Dow components was that, despite numerous and serious legal problems, AIG (AIG) was tied with General Electric (GE) and Du Pont (DD) for the third best rating, only bested by Citigroup (C) and Microsoft (MSFT). AIG was actually more highly recommended by analysts than J.P. Morgan Chase’s (JPM) and American Express (AXP).

This didn’t do much for my confidence in analyst ratings.

So I dug a little deeper looking at the more statistically significant S&P 500. What I found was that companies in the index with the worst revenue performance did actually carry more sell ratings than companies with the best performance.

At least analysts were using the sell rating, something they seldom did in the past.

There was, however, a significant bias towards the neutral ‘Hold’ rating for all stocks indicating reluctance on the part of analysts to commit to buy and sell recommendations.

Mark Mahorney MarketSpectator.com BlogginWallStreet.com MarketBlog.com



About Author :
Mark Mahorney is a freelance financial writer for hire.

Home >> Finance

More Related Articles in " Finance "
>>
Spotting tax foreclosure property in USA [ Author : mike ]
>>
5 Steps To Healthy Spending Habits [ Author : Barbara Gibson ]
>>
Credit Scoring For Beginners [ Author : Frank Bruno ]
>>
Avoid Payment Holidays - Always [ Author : Lee Asher ]
>>
Get More By Offering Seller Financing [ Author : Steve Gillman ]
>>
The History of Business Loans [ Author : John Williams ]
>>
How To Research And Refine Your Trading Techniques For Free [ Author : Peter Lim ]
>>
Why is an Estate Plan Necessary? [ Author : First Commonwealth Financial Corporation ]
>>
Avoiding the Holiday Spending Hangover... [ Author : Cindy Morus ]
>>
Recruiting and Training Fundraiser Volunteers [ Author : Michelle Pearson ]
 

 
© Copyright 2005-2007 Free Articles by articleburn.com All rights reserved
eXTReMe Tracker