08 Mar 2008 12:28:38 | Naweko San-Joyz
If you have acne, you know the deal- everybody has a cream or
suggestion to help you get clear skin. But how do you separate
myth, medicine and folklore to find an acne treatment that works
for you? That’s what researcher Parker Magin set out to do in a
study entitled, A systematic review of the evidence for ‘myths
and misconceptions’ in acne management.
Magin and co-researchers from the University of Newcastle, New
South Wales, conclude that clinicians cannot be “didactic” when
making acne treatment recommendations that are based on diet,
hygiene and sunlight exposure. According to Magin, acne
treatments should be individualized.
Meanwhile, the Academy of Dermatology has published a press
release touting, The Stubborn Truth About Acne: Myths and
Misconceptions. Though this article discusses a recent Stanford
University survey that examined acne myths held among young
adults, it offers no solid advice for securing an acne antidote.
Moreover, its meaning is paradoxical.
For example, the article headlines Alexa Boer Kimball, M.D. who
is an assistant professor of dermatology at Harvard University.
Dr. Kimballs sums up the survey on acne by saying “that
substantial differences still exist between popular belief and
scientific support, yet this does not change the way patients
attempt to care for their acne.”
Dr. Kimballs’s comments at the Annual Meeting of the American
Academy of Dermatology casts a discrediting shadow over her
groundbreaking research that aimed to separate acne fact from
fiction. Just two years ago in 2003, Dr. Kimball was apart of a
Stanford University study investigating the effect of stress on
acne. Then, Dr. Kimball concluded that, “increased acne severity
was significantly associated with increased stress levels… while
self-assessed change in diet quality was the only other
significant association.” The results of this study suggested
that the link between acne, and diet and stress are no longer
hypothetical but warrant further examination.
Another investigation aiming to demystify acne came for Dr.
Loren Cordain. Cordain and his associates explored the link
between diet and acne in a study called Acne Vulgaris: A Disease
of Western Civilization. Cordain noted that Kitavan Islanders of
Papua New Guinea and the Aché hunter-gatherers of Paraguay had
no active cases of acne. This prompted the question, “So why
does acne vulgaris affect 79% to 95% of the adolescent
population in westernized societies?”
Cordain found that genes alone do not cause the disparity of
acne incidences between non-westernized and modernized
societies. Other factors must enter the equation.
Acne can arise from hormonal shifts, stress upheavals and a host
of other causes. Your best defense against acne is observing
yourself and noting what conditions, foods and emotions
aggravate your acne situation. From there, you can use self-care
to reduce acne flare-ups.
About Author :
Health author and Noixia campaigner Naweko San-Joyz lovingly
writes from her home in San Diego. Her works include “Acne
Messages: Crack the code of your zits and say goodbye to acne”
(ISBN: 0974912204) and the upcoming work “Skinny Fat Chicks, Why
we’re still not getting this dieting thing” (ISBN: 0974912212)
for release in June of 2005. For useful acne self-help articles
visit http://www.Noixia.com.