25 Feb 2008 02:28:34 | Andrew Karasev
Microsoft Business Solutions Great Plains serves mid-size and
large clients in horizontal and vertical markets. Historically
Great Plains Software was encouraging ISV partner to write third
party modules and later on – Great Plains Software had a chance
to select the product for incorporation into their core set of
modules: Manufacturing, Project Accounting, Purchase Order
Processing, Collection Management, etc. Today we’ll consider
Microsoft Great Plains implementation specifics for large
pharmaceutical corporation.
•Product Research cost. New product research and testing could
be grouped into cost center and Microsoft Great Plains offers
several Project solutions. The most reliable way is to deploy
Great Plains Project Accounting. This module could work in the
multicurrency environment, when you incur R&D cost in multiple
countries. Then in the first year of product release you can
track P&L by your product. There are certain restrictions,
however – you typically have one customer, who pays your Project
bills. Obviously it is not the case for new product. However you
can consider your organization as an association of internal
customers
•Multinational Payroll. In each country you have to implement
Payroll solution. In the case of Microsoft Great Plains you can
have separate company for each local subsidiary and implement
US, Canadian, Brazilian, Middle Eastern Payroll modules as well
as Payroll custom solutions for most of Latin American
countries, South Africa and Australia
•Intercompanies Transactions. In Great Plains these transactions
are automated and the transaction results in parallel
transaction, involving due to and due from accounts. You can
also do it manually
•GL consolidation. This was popular approach in Europe with
sophisticated multicurrency and strict tax regulation issues
back in earlier 1990th. Nowadays you can use reporting tools to
achieve the same goal. FRx could do the job, consolidation Great
Plains companies.
•EDI. Typical case when Purchasing is automated via EDI. In
Great Plains you have multiple options to implement it. The
simplest would be SQL queries with strict EDI formatting
•Internal Audit. Internal Audit requires you to have random
samples. Good example is AP checks and payments. The solution
lays in using external reporting tool, based on MS SQL Server
stored procedures, such as Crystal Reports. The random selection
itself is Transact SQL routine. We are raising this question,
because we saw the company struggling to implement this
reporting with no luck
We encourage you to analyze your alternatives. You can always
appeal to our help, give us a call: 1-866-528-0577 or
1-630-961-5918, help@albaspectrum.com
About Author :
Andrew Karasev is Chief Technology Officer at Alba Spectrum
Technologies ( http://www.albaspectrum.com ), serving Microsoft
Great Plains, CRM, Navision to mid-size and large clients in
California, Illinois, New York, Georgia, Florida, Texas,
Arizona, Washington, Minnesota, Ohio, Michigan