|
24 Feb 2008 12:33:15 | CMOE Development Team
Is it possible to make a strong “business case for corporate
coaching?” Why is coaching vital to organizations? Why should
leaders invest time developing their coaching skills? These are
tough, important questions that organizations should consider
before implementing coaching.
The need for corporate coaching certainly depends on the
situation. In some cases, it could be argued that time spent
learning and doing coaching provides only small returns. If you
have an operation with few people doing routine or rather
insignificant tasks, it probably won’t matter if managers can
coach, develop, and lead people. But, in an entirely different
environment, the quality of corporate coaching and feedback
could matter a great deal.
- For Example, the New York Times reported on an
investigational survey of medical interns and residents. The
results of the survey stated that nearly half of the interns
failed to report mistakes and discuss situations with
supervising physicians.
How can people effectively learn and develop when key people are
unwilling to approach leaders, and leaders are too busy “putting
out fires” instead of teaching and coaching in response to
performance issues. When seeking medical care, most of us would
prefer a health care professional who has not only received
technical schooling, but has also benefited from a trusted coach
and mentor who has shared honest feedback and wisdom that only
comes from experience.
How do you know if you are in the type of business or
organization where corporate coaching is value added? Consider
applying the following formula: C(5)+ED. Although it sounds
scientific, the formula is actually an easy way to diagnosis
whether or not you should invest time and money in perfecting
coaching skills and applying them in the workplace.
The following survey identifies the components of the C(5)+ED
formula. C(5)+ED is the ultimate test in determining how much
time, money, and energy to invest in corporate coaching and
development.
“C” – COMPETITIVENESS
Does your business deal with strong competition?YesNo
Do you have to fight for market share and profitability?YesNo
If you are lucky enough to have a virtual monopoly over the
competition, then you probably won’t feel the pressure to excel
or require the very best thinking and craftsmanship for sales,
production, or technical/professional people. But, if you
answered “yes” to either question, you need leaders who are
capable of influencing the behavior of others.
“C” – COMMITMENT
Does your organization/culture require innovation, independent
action, and voluntary motivation?YesNo
If you are able to “enforce” compliance, and you really don’t
need people to think creatively, then you are off the hook. But,
if you answered “yes” to this question, you need leaders who
know how to communicate, inspire, and bring out the desire in
team members to “give it their all.”
“C” – CHANGE
Is your business dynamic, complex, and fast-paced?YesNo
If you answered “yes,” you need people who can adapt to changes
in technology, the marketplace, or new programs and products.
You need leaders who can guide, encourage, and help people
overcome resistance to change.
“C” – CULTURE
Does your business culture stress the importance of values,
principles, teamwork, ethical behavior, etc.?YesNo
If you answered “yes,” then you need leaders to promote, coach,
and hold team members accountable for their behavior. You need
leaders who set an example, and gain the respect of others. You
need leaders who will speak up and stand up for the ideals that
the organization promotes.
“C” – COMPLIANCE
Is your business accountable to legal, industry, safety, health,
or other standards?YesNo
Are there specific policies, protocols, and formulas that cannot
be compromised?YesNo
If you answered “yes” to either question, then you need coaches
to monitor and ensure that performance is measuring up. You need
leaders with the courage and skill to confront problems in a
positive and constructive manner so that people want to achieve
the standards.
“E” – EXCELLENCE
Does your organization value continuous improvement, ingenuity,
and developing your processes to achieve better performance and
higher quality for your customers?YesNo
If you answered “yes,” then you need leaders who can coach and
encourage team members to critically examine the traditional
ways of doing things. Leaders also need to coach team members to
be creative and try new methods.
“D” – DEVELOPMENT
Does your organization need to retain talented team
members?YesNo
Are your current team members ambitious, and do they want to
learn and grow?YesNo
If you answered “yes” to either question, then you need leaders
who can coach, mentor, and train team members to achieve current
performance objectives, as well as prepare them for future
strategic positions. You need leaders who understand the value
and need for individual development plans and activities, so
team members will want to stay, grow, and contribute to the
organization.
EXAMPLES
Consider the following examples that illustrate what happens
when corporate coaching isn’t practiced, and what the
possibilities could be if leaders did successfully coach.
Retention: According to the Gallup organization, the
number one reason an individual leaves a job is because they are
dissatisfied with their working relationship with their manager.
-Buckingham & Coffman - First, Break All the Rules
Trust: Five out of seven managers would rather lie than give
honest feedback. -Jan Halper, Ph.D. - Quiet Desperation
Loyalty: During a competitive comparison shopping session at
a national retail chain store, a customer went through the
checkout line with a bicycle that cost over $200. To the
customer’s surprise, the cashier rang up the bicycle and told
him it would be $50. The customer told the cashier that she must
have made a mistake because this bicycle is over $200. The
cashier politely smiles and said, “I know it is. But I’m mad at
my boss today. Therefore, the bicycle is only $50.” -Joe S.
Walker Safety: Front line supervisors who coach
employees on their safety measures have 28% fewer accidents in
their work teams than those who do not coach. -Study by CMOE,
1994 Bottom Line: A recent study shows that Sales
Managers in Europe achieve a 5% higher volume of sales when
coaching is used. -Fortune 500 pharmaceutical company
Morale: According to a recent study, the number one desire
of employees is to receive personal feedback. This ranks in at
46% in comparison to 32% who said they preferred financial
rewards. -USA Today, December 1998 Corporate Coaching
Moments: Managers spend 57-89% of their time in face-to-face
communication. -Journal of Applied Psychology
Credibility: Some leaders at Andersen know that their
auditors at Enron are stretching the rules. Where is the
accountability and leadership? -Business Week, April
2002
About Author :
For more information on how to maximize the corporate
coaching efforts inside your organization please visit CMOE. You can also
contact one of our Regional Managers at (801)569-3444.
|