23 Feb 2008 03:21:11 | Sam Vaknin
The fourth edition of the authoritative "Review of General
Psychiatry" (London, Prentice-Hall International, 1995), says
(p. 309):
"(People with personality disorders) ... cause resentment and
possibly even alienation and burnout in the healthcare
professionals who treat them ... (p. 318) Long-term
psychoanalytic psychotherapy and psychoanalysis have been
attempted with (narcissists), although their use has been
controversial."
The reason narcissism is under-reported and healing over-stated
is that therapists are being fooled by smart narcissists. Most
narcissists are expert manipulators and consummate actors and
they learn how to deceive their therapists.
Here are some hard facts:
There are gradations and shades of narcissism. The differences
between two narcissists can be great. The existence of
grandiosity and empathy or lack thereof are not minor
variations. They are serious predictors of future
psychodynamics. The prognosis is much better if they do exist.
There are cases of spontaneous healing, Acquired Situational
Narcissism, and of "short-term NPD" [see Gunderson's and
Ronningstam work, 1996]. The prognosis for a classical
narcissist (grandiosity, lack of empathy and all) is decidedly
not good as far as long-term, lasting, and complete healing.
Moreover, narcissists are intensely disliked by therapists. BUT…
Side effects, co-morbid disorders (such as Obsessive-Compulsive
behaviors) and some aspects of NPD (the dysphorias, the
persecutory delusions, the sense of entitlement, the
pathological lying) can be modified (using talk therapy and,
depending on the problem, medication). These are not long-term
or complete solutions – but some of them do have long-term
effects. The DSM is a billing and administration oriented
diagnostic tool. It is intended to "tidy" up the psychiatrist's
desk. The Axis II Personality Disorders are ill demarcated. The
differential diagnoses are vaguely defined. There are some
cultural biases and judgements [see the diagnostic criteria of
the Schizotypal and Antisocial PDs]. The result is sizeable
confusion and multiple diagnoses ("co-morbidity"). NPD was
introduced to the DSM in 1980 [DSM-III]. There isn't enough
research to substantiate any view or hypothesis about NPD.
Future DSM editions may abolish it altogether within the
framework of a cluster or a single "personality disorder"
category. When we ask: "Can NPD be healed?" we need to realise
that we don't know for sure what is NPD and what constitutes
long-term healing in the case of an NPD. There are those who
seriously claim that NPD is a cultural disease (culture-bound)
with a societal determinant. Narcissists in Therapy
In therapy, the general idea is to create the conditions for the
True Self to resume its growth: safety, predictability, justice,
love and acceptance - a mirroring, re-aprenting, and holding
environment. Therapy is supposed to provide these conditions of
nurturance and guidance (through transference, cognitive
re-labelling or other methods). The narcissist must learn that
his past experiences are not laws of nature, that not all adults
are abusive, that relationships can be nurturing and supportive.
Most therapists try to co-opt the narcissist's inflated ego
(False Self) and defences. They compliment the narcissist,
challenging him to prove his omnipotence by overcoming his
disorder. They appeal to his quest for perfection, brilliance,
and eternal love - and his paranoid tendencies - in an attempt
to get rid of counterproductive, self-defeating, and
dysfunctional behaviour patterns.
By stroking the narcissist's grandiosity, they hope to modify or
counter cognitive deficits, thinking errors, and the
narcissist's victim-stance. They contract with the narcissist to
alter his conduct. Some even go to the extent of medicalizing
the disorder, attributing it to a hereditary or biochemical
origin and thus "absolving" the narcissist from his
responsibility and freeing his mental resources to concentrate
on the therapy.
Confronting the narcissist head on and engaging in power
politics ("I am cleverer", "My will should prevail", and so on)
is decidedly unhelpful and could lead to rage attacks and a
deepening of the narcissist's persecutory delusions, bred by his
humiliation in the therapeutic setting.
Successes have been reported by applying 12-step techniques (as
modified for patients suffering from the Antisocial Personality
Disorder), and with treatment modalities as diverse as NLP
(Neurolinguistic Programming), Schema Therapy, and EMDR (Eye
Movement Desensitization).
But, whatever the type of talk therapy, the narcissist devalues
the therapist. His internal dialogue is: "I know best, I know it
all, the therapist is less intelligent than I, I can't afford
the top level therapists who are the only ones qualified to
treat me (as my equals, needless to say), I am actually a
therapist myself…"
A litany of self-delusion and fantastic grandiosity (really,
defences and resistances) ensues: "He (my therapist) should be
my colleague, in certain respects it is he who should accept my
professional authority, why won't he be my friend, after all I
can use the lingo (psycho-babble) even better than he does? It's
us (him and me) against a hostile and ignorant world (shared
psychosis, follies-a-deux)…"
Then there is this internal dialog: "Just who does he think he
is, asking me all these questions? What are his professional
credentials? I am a success and he is a nobody therapist in a
dingy office, he is trying to negate my uniqueness, he is an
authority figure, I hate him, I will show him, I will humiliate
him, prove him ignorant, have his licence revoked
(transference). Actually, he is pitiable, a zero, a failure…"
And this is only in the first three sessions of the therapy.
This abusive internal exchange becomes more vituperative and
pejorative as therapy progresses.
Narcissists generally are averse to being medicated. Resorting
to medicines is an implied admission that something is wrong.
Narcissists are control freaks and hate to be "under the
influence" of "mind altering" drugs prescribed to them by
others.
Additionally, many of them believe that medication is the "great
equaliser" – it will make them lose their uniqueness,
superiority and so on. That is unless they can convincingly
present the act of taking their medicines as "heroism", a daring
enterprise of self-exploration, part of a breakthrough clinical
trial, and so on.
They often claim that the medicine affects them differently than
it does other people, or that they have discovered a new,
exciting way of using it, or that they are part of someone's
(usually themselves) learning curve ("part of a new approach to
dosage", "part of a new cocktail which holds great promise").
Narcissists must dramatise their lives to feel worthy and
special. Aut nihil aut unique – either be special or don't be at
all. Narcissists are drama queens.
Very much like in the physical world, change is brought about
only through incredible powers of torsion and breakage. Only
when the narcissist's elasticity gives way, only when he is
wounded by his own intransigence – only then is there hope.
It takes nothing less than a real crisis. Ennui is not enough.
About Author :
Sam Vaknin is the author of Malignant Self Love - Narcissism
Revisited and After the Rain - How the West Lost the East. He is
a columnist for Central Europe Review, PopMatters, and eBookWeb
, a United Press International (UPI) Senior Business
Correspondent, and the editor of mental health and Central East
Europe categories in The Open Directory Bellaonline, and
Suite101 .