22 Feb 2008 03:51:47 | Richard A. Chapo
One of the touted advantages of owning a corporation is the ease
in transferring shares. In many cases, this assumed benefit is
simply wrong.
Transfer Shares
According to "experts", using a corporation has one bid
advantage over other entities. The advantage is the ability to
freely transfer shares without impacting the business or
viability of the corporate structure. Consider the following
example.
If I own a 60 percent interest in a general partnership, I can't
just sell it to someone else. In most states, the transfer of
more than 50 percent of an interest in a partnership
automatically terminates it. With a corporation, however, there
is no such prohibition. Instead, I am free to transfer shares
without restriction and the business just purrs along without
any interruption.
As with many assumptions, the "free transferability" assumption
runs into problems in the real world. This is particularly true
if the corporation has entered into contracts with other large
companies.
Accidentally Terminating Contracts
State laws govern the formation and running of most business
entities. These laws, however, do not trump general contract
law. Instead, deference is given to the terms two or more
parties agree upon in the formation of a contract and this is
where the free transferability experts fall on their faces.
In our modern economy, a majority of companies will require
language in a contract stating that any transfer of more than
"xxx" percentage of shares automatically voids the contract
between the parties. The reason for this is parties want to know
whom they are doing business with at all times. Assume I want to
do business with a corporation that has three engineers who are
the best in their field. I don't want to sign a five-year
contract with them only to see the three engineers sell their
shares and leave the company during the term of the contract. In
requiring the language restricting share transfers, I am making
sure I will benefit from their expertise.
Many shareholders in small businesses fail to take into account
share restriction language in contracts. Instead, they go out
and sell their shares to a third party with dreams of retirement
on a white beach somewhere. They are more than a little
surprised when served with a lawsuit by the share buyer who is
angry because a number of contracts for the corporation have
been terminated. In Seinfeld terminology, "No white beaches FOR
YOU!"
Before you get excited about selling your shares in a
corporation make sure you check the language of all contracts
with third parties. You don't want to have to come back from
that white beach.
About Author :
Richard A. Chapo is a San Diego business lawyer with
http://www.sandiegobusinesslawfirm.com - providing legal
services and legal advice to businesses in San Diego,
California.